drugcostfacts.org
Menu Home

Search form

Key Questions

X
  • Are prescription drug costs out of control?
  • Why are some drugs so expensive?
  • How are prescription drug costs really determined?
  • Does increasing out-of-pocket spending reduce premiums?
  • Shouldn't the U.S. Government do more to regulate high drug prices?
  • How does the U.S. maintain its leadership in innovation?
  • How much do innovative new drugs impact overall health care costs?
  • What role does private sector R&D play compared to NIH?
  • Follow the debate...
  • See all questions
  • Advocate Toolkit
  • Follow the Debate

Follow the Debate

Direct Government Negotiations on Price

Medicare should be able to conduct direct negotiations with drug manufacturers to lower prices.

Elected Official
Elected Official
Elected Official
Elected Official
  • The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has reported that direct Medicare “negotiations” would NOT save the government money in terms of lower drug costs—unless the government also was given the power to impose formulary restrictions and reduced benefits. We shouldn’t give the government power to dictate what drugs seniors can obtain through a “one-size-fits-all” plan.
  • By contrast, the current Medicare prescription drug program, known as Part D, provides seniors choice and competition and has been widely successful, keeping total costs low—$349 billion lower than the initial CBO 10-year projections.  This has been accomplished due to aggressive competition among large, sophisticated insurers that already negotiate significant rebates and discounts from drug companies.  The Medicare program benefits from this market-based competition that continues to drive drug prices lower.
  • As we’ve seen in other countries, governments don’t “negotiate” drug prices, they dictate them.  And like all price controls, such government-set prices will lead to less supply, less innovation, and less access for American patients to the drugs they truly need.
  • In fact, research shows that, if the United States had adopted EU-style price controls in the past, the world would have 117 fewer new medicines today.
  • Over 200 patient groups have sent a letter to Congress expressing opposition to proposals that would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to interfere in private negotiations in the Medicare Part D program. The letter outlines concerns that such proposals could undermine Part D’s competitive structure and restrict access for millions of seniors and individuals with disabilities

Additional Reading & Resources

Forbes; The U.S. Has Been The World's Medicine Cabinet For Too Long

Joseph H. Golec and John A. Vernon, “Financial Effects of Pharmaceutical Price Regulation on R&D Spending by EU versus US Firms,” Pharmacoeconomics 28, no. 8, (2010): 615–628.

Kutyavina, M. (2010). The Effect of Price Control Threats on Pharmaceutical R&D Investments (master's thesis). Stanford University, Stanford, California.

 

debates

  • Importation of Drugs
  • International Drug Pricing
  • Private and Public R&D Financing

BIO

 © BIO 2021 All Rights Reserved

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • Youtube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Graphic Library